Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Harris v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2023cv01417
Plaintiff:
Rakeem Harris
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, Adam Stone, Taylor Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mote v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2021cv01179
Defendant:
Normal Police Department, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bloomington Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Mote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creater v. Bloomington Police Department
as 1:2021cv01052
Defendant:
Bloomington Police Department
Plaintiff:
Eddie Creater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Legner et al
as 1:2018cv01429
Defendant:
The City of Bloomington, Bloomington Police Department, Edward Shumaker and others
Plaintiff:
Myron Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Menken v. McLean County State's Attorney Office et al
as 1:2017cv01565
Plaintiff:
Eric James Menken
Defendant:
McLean County State's Attorney Office, . Goldrick, . Freitag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coe v. Raisbeck et al
as 1:2016cv01311
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Coe
Defendant:
Kevin Raisbeck, Chad Warnsley, City of Bloomington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reecer v. Newberry et al
as 1:2016cv01252
Plaintiff:
Randy R Reecer
Defendant:
Richard Newberry, Jim Modine and Bloomington Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hosea v. Lutes et al
as 1:2014cv01399
Plaintiff:
Jason Hosea
Defendant:
Jim Lutes, Tom Dewry, Bloomington Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hosea v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2012cv01489
Plaintiff:
Jason Douglas Hosea
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, City of Normal, McLean County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
