Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Greer v. Hall County, Georgia et al
as 2:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Dewon Greer
Defendant:
Hall County, Georgia, Sheriff Gerald Couch, Officer Johnathan Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Wunderlich v. Conklin et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Robert Mitchell Wunderlich
Defendant:
Ed Conklin, Bowlero Inc. and United States Bowling Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Common Cause et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Common Cause, League of Women Voters of Georgia, Dr. Ursula Thomas and others
Defendant:
Brad Raffensperger, John Kennedy and Bonnie Rich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reid v. Collins et al
as 1:2020cv04418
Defendant:
Kurt Collins and Christopher Bowles
Plaintiff:
Quincy Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowles v. Montgomery
as 3:2020cv00061
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bowles
Defendant:
Adam Wayne Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bowles et al v. Mayton et al
as 4:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
Elliot Stoney Bowles and Ellen Starlene Dodd
Defendant:
Mark Mayton, John Leslie Cheek, Alious Scott Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
