Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Estate of Michael Rogel v. Bozeman Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Estate of Michael Rogel
Defendant:
Bozeman City Police Department, Justin Chaffins, Zachary Garfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker et al v. City of Bozeman et al
as 2:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Damon Baker and Natasha Baker
Defendant:
City of Bozeman, Hannah Helsby, Gallatin County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Peter Thompson and Nikolais Lang Thompson
Defendant:
State of Montana, Greg Gianforte, Austin Knudsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Lonnie v. Kappler et al
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Christine L. Lonnie
Defendant:
Andrew Kappler, Ryan Jeppson, Zachary Garfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hessert v City of Bozeman
as 2:2021cv00045
Defendant:
City of Bozeman
Plaintiff:
John T. Hessert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Thompson v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2018cv00075
Defendant:
Cattail Creek Community Association(s) of Phase I, II and III & of the Combined Covenant Association, Daniel S. Madison, Amanda Menasco and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. City of Bozeman et al
as 2:2018cv00043
Defendant:
City of Bozeman and Greg Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Terry Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
