Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
CARMICHAEL v. CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv05019
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KALIEF v. CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv05729
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CCPD/DEA TASK FORCE, USMS CUSTODIAN OF SADF and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY KALIEF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HOPPS v. CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv01411
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOPPS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT , GEORGE LEWIS, III , ADAM TUVEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKS v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv03436
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A HICKS, JR
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, METRODIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al v. BEY
as 1:2015cv08222
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CAMDEN MUNICIPAL COURT, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
NASIR EL RAZUL BEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MACKLIN v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2015cv07641
Plaintiff:
MALIKY MACKLIN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN , CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT , JOHN SCOTT THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DICKERSON v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2014cv06905
Plaintiff:
DARREN A. DICKERSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, NIGEL SHOCKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
