Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Chambers v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Plaintiff:
Robert Chambers
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-10, Officer Kenneth Short and City of Jackson, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Julien-Mims et al v. Hancock County Chamber of Commerce
as 1:2019cv00339
Defendant:
Hancock County Chamber of Commerce
Plaintiff:
Constance E. St. Julien-Mims and Unique Transitions Training Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Wilkinson County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2016cv00124
Plaintiff:
Edward Brown
Defendant:
Wilkinson County Sheriff Department, Reginald Lee Jackson, Ed Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Moore et al v. Mississippi Gaming Commission et al
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ronald Moore and Intouch Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Mississippi Gaming Commission , John Hairston , Nolen Canon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
