Cases 1 - 10 of 65
MCCANTS v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
as 2:2024cv05837
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MCCANTS
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO doing business as JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DILLARD v. WELLS FARGO BANK et al
as 2:2024cv04146
Plaintiff:
DERECK DILLARD
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK and CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOPEZ v. SICKLER et al
as 1:2024cv03980
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOPEZ
Defendant:
MATTHEW SICKLER, TARA DZURKOC, MITCHELL LUYBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
M&T BANK v. ARSENIS et al
as 3:2023cv20637
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
GOICOECHEA v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. et al
as 2:2023cv03900
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN GOICOECHEA
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. and JOHN DOES 1-5 and 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
GOICOECHEA v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. et al
as 3:2023cv03900
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN GOICOECHEA
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
