Cases 1 - 10 of 258
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
MCCANTS v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
as 2:2024cv05837
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MCCANTS
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO doing business as JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
STIER, ESQ v. POSSEBON et al
as 3:2024cv04647
Defendant:
TW BRASIL LTDA, EMPIRE STRONG INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INTERMEDIATION, LLC, DIEGO POSSEBON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN H. STIER, ESQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DODSON v. TD BANK HEADQUARTERS et al
as 2:2024cv04431
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Defendant:
TD BANK HEADQUARTERS, SMART CELL, DRIVEWORKS AUTO CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
RITCHWOOD v. CITY OF HOBOKEN et al
as 2:2024cv02031
Plaintiff:
JASON RITCHWOOD
Defendant:
CITY OF HOBOKEN, ROBERTO CUEVAS, WILFRED GOMEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
