Cases 1 - 10 of 16
People of the State of California v. Abdel-Malak
as 4:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Pierce et al v. Hate Crime Victim Jane/John Doe
as 4:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
David Pierce, Sherrie Pierce, Breanna Pierce and others
Defendant:
Hate Crime Victim Jane/John Doe and Ava Malak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The People of the State of California, United States of America, et. al. v. Hate Crime Victime Jane/John Doe
as 4:2021cv00270
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, United States of America, et. al.
Defendant:
Hate Crime Victime Jane/John Doe and Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00601
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
The State of California v. Abdel-Malak
as 4:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
The State of California
Defendant:
Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
The People of the State of California, United States of America, et. al. v. Abdel-Malak
as 4:2020cv00232
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, United States of America, et. al.
Defendant:
Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ahmed v. City of Hodgenville et al
as 1:2014cv04156
Plaintiff:
Oluwashina Ahmed
Defendant:
City of Hodgenville, Washington, D.C., Ford's Theatre, Washington, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. State of California
as 1:2014cv03696
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ulyesses Hayes, Jr
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
