Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gordon Smith v. David Angelo, et al
as 17-2389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GORDON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ANGELO, Delaware Department of Corrections, ROBERT COUPE, Delaware State Police, JAMES FRALEY, Delaware State Police and others
Floyd et al v. Markell et al
as 1:2017cv00431
Plaintiff:
Saundra M. Floyd , Candyss C. White , Steven R. Floyd, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Jack Markell , Ruth Ann Minner , Stanley W. Taylor, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nina Shahin v. Justin Richey, et al
as 13-3721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NINA SHAHIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN Z. RICHEY, Officer, CITY OF DOVER, CITY OF DOVER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Shahin v. Richey et al
as 1:2013cv01405
Plaintiff:
Nina Shahin
Defendant:
Justin Z. Richey, City of Dover, City of Dover Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wharton et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv01240
Plaintiff:
Philip A. Wharton , Joseph Roundtree , James Maddox and others
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Cathy Escherich and Rebecca McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv00392
Plaintiff:
Errol Springer
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Perry Phelps, Cathy Escherich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
