Cases 1 - 10 of 23
MALEK v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv04344
Defendant:
SAFE HORIZON, CORPORATION COUNSEL, MATTHEW DUFFY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MALEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COULL v. ROBERTS et al
as 3:2023cv03657
Plaintiff:
SIMON COULL
Defendant:
JUDGE DANIEL ROBERTS, JUDGE CAROLINE ENRIGHT, JUDGE GARRY ROTHSTADT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAMOTHE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT et al
as 3:2022cv06499
Plaintiff:
JEAN B. LAMOTHE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, COMMISSIONER ROB ASARO-ANGELO, CAROLINE STOUT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JAPPAH v. PATEL et al
as 2:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
Caroline Jappah
Defendant:
DOE, TMC FRANCHISE CORP., Narnarayan 1 Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HUSSEY et al v. THE PENNINGTON SCHOOL et al
as 3:2020cv14673
Defendant:
THE PENNINGTON SCHOOL, HEADMASTER WILLIAM S HAWKEY, DIRECTOR OF CERVONE JO PROCKOP and others
Plaintiff:
JEANNA ELIZABETH HUSSEY and JEMMA BREANNA HUSSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv21564
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv18983
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
REED et al v. OLIVER, COMMISSIONER
as 3:2018cv04560
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE REED , CAROLINE MELCHIORRE , ROBERT CAVOTTO and others
Defendant:
SHEILA OLIVER, COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JAYE v. SHIPP et al
as 1:2017cv05257
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant:
US AG FITZPATRICK (NJ), DANIEL GIBBONS, NJ ATTORNEY GENERAL PORRINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAYE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 3:2016cv07771
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant:
JOHN HOFFMAN, IONE CURVA, PETER BUCHSBAUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
