Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Wheeler Walker v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lavon Wheeler Walker
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Wade Damron and Christopher Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wheeler v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lavon Wheeler
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Christopher Carr and Wade Damron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Appeal, Inc. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
The Appeal, Inc.
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Shawn Emmons, Georgia Attorney Gen Christopher M. Carr and others
Washington v. Carr et al
as 1:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
Raymond Washington
Defendant:
Chris Carr, Kathryn Powers, Scott Kreher and others
Carr v. McConnell
as 1:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Brandi Carr
Defendant:
Ian McConnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Flora et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Clyde Kennard Jones
Defendant:
Amanda Flora, April Blackburn, Gregory Louis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phipps v. Lewis et al
as 1:2023cv05511
Plaintiff:
Tony Lavale Phipps
Defendant:
Judge Chaundra D. Lewis, Lynne M. Policaro, Pamela M. Bettis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Watkins v. Carr et al
as 1:2023cv04120
Plaintiff:
Charles Watkins
Defendant:
Attorney General Christopher Carr, Chief Judge R. Timothy Hamil, District Attorney Patsy Austin Gastin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Office of Aging/Adult Protective Services et al
as 1:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
Mary Fore Lee
Defendant:
Office of Aging/Adult Protective Services, Attorney General Chris Carr, Bill Westenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
