Cases 1 - 10 of 385
Sanders v. City of Piedmont et al
as 3:2024cv03385
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sanders
Defendant:
City of Piedmont, Brian Castillo and Jasdeep Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Medina v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Tina Medina
Defendant:
Judge Laura H. Miller, Judge Maureen H. Hallahan, Judge Jose S. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Artiaga Castillo v. City Of San Jose
as 5:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Mary Hope Artiaga Castillo
Defendant:
City Of San Jose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Guapo-Villegas v. City of Soledad et al
as 5:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Martin Guapo-Villegas
Defendant:
City of Soledad, Alejandro Castillo and Mustafa Yasin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
