Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Cook v. Avery et al
as 5:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Eric Cook
Defendant:
Chance Avery and City of the Village The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brauning v. Christian et al
as 6:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Defendant:
John Gilbert Christian, Charles Steven Kessinger, Lori Lynn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackfox v. Moore et al
as 4:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Heather Linn Blackfox
Defendant:
Harlan Moore , Adiel Garcia, Chance Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chance et al v. Vandiver et al
as 6:2015cv00206
Defendant:
Sandy Vandiver, Miranda McKinney, Pat Strayhorn and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Mac Chance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chance v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2014cv00449
Plaintiff:
Jessica L Chance
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Ray Driskell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carshall v. Leflore County Detention Center Public Trust et al
as 6:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
Felisha Carshall
Defendant:
Leflore County Detention Center Public Trust , Claude Jones , Kevin Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
