Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MCCOY v. WHARTON
as 1:2016cv04589
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P MCCOY
Defendant:
ROBERT WHARTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETON et al v. TOWNSHIP OF BELLEVILLE et al
as 2:2014cv00503
Plaintiff:
JUDY BRETON , MELANIE BRETON , EMELY TERESA CESPEDES-BRETON and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF BELLEVILLE , BELLEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT , MATTHEW DOX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
MONAGHAN et al v. CITY OF HACKENSACK et al
as 2:2013cv04544
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MONAGHAN , FRANK CALLAHAN , DANNY CALLAHAN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF HACKENSACK , MAYOR & COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HACKENSACK , PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF HACKENSACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON et al
as 2:2011cv06855
Plaintiff:
WALTER W. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON , IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , HAROLD C. BORK, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KISSOONDATH et al v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2011cv03281
Plaintiff:
SASHA R. KISSOONDATH and BRANDY KISSOONDATH
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND , CITY OF VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT , TIMOTHY CODISPATI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
KISSOONDATH et al v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2011cv02580
Plaintiff:
SASHA R. KISSOONDATH and BRANDY KISSOONDATH
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND , CITY OF VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT , TIMOTHY CODISPATI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2010cv06641
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P. LUCY, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EATON v. TOSTI et al
as 2:2009cv05248
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P. EATON
Defendant:
THOMAS TOSTI, NEIL CASEY, THE TOWN OF NEWTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
