Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pham v. Redline Recovery Services, LLC et al
as 5:2013cv01843
Plaintiff:
Hoan Pham
Defendant:
Redline Recovery Services, LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Home Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Makreas v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv02836
Plaintiff:
Nick Makreas
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Washington Mutual Bank, Chase Home Finance LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carolyn Miner v. Chase Home Finance et al
as 2:2012cv03738
Defendant:
Deborah Brignac, CT Corporation, California Reconveyance Co and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Miner
Tang et al v. California Reconveyance Company et al
as 5:2010cv03333
Plaintiff:
Vincent Tang and Lien Tang
Defendant:
California Reconveyance Company, JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Chase Home Finance LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Paul Clark et al v. Houston, TX Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv01559
Plaintiff:
Paul Clark, Sebastian Drake and Vivian Drake
Defendant:
Houston, TX Police Department, Ford Bend County Sheriffs Department, Texas State Attorney Generals Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sobayo et al v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al
as 5:2009cv00615
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Basola Sobayo and Emmanuel & Alice Osindele
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance LLC, Chase Home Finance LLC and Countrywide Home Loans
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodney L Belle, Sr v. Homecomings Financial/JP Morgan Chase, et al
as 5:2007cv01042
Plaintiff:
Rodney L Belle, Sr
Defendant:
Homecomings Financial/JP Morgan Chase, Loanstar Mortgage Services LLC, Chase Home Finance LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Beaton v. Chase Home Finance
as 2:2007cv01321
Plaintiff:
Paul N. Beaton
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
