Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Reynolds v. Minter et al
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Terry Darnell Reynolds
Defendant:
Roy Mintor, Savannah Chatham Metro Police Department, Vincent Pelligrini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hickman v. The State of Georgia et al
as 4:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Saleem Omari Hickman
Defendant:
The State of Georgia and Chatham County Court System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Foxworth et al v. Brookside Properties
as 4:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Olivia Foxworth and Saleem Hickman
Defendant:
Brookside Properties and Savannah, Chatham County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ziel v. Chatham County, Georgia et al
as 4:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ziel
Defendant:
Chatham County, Georgia, M.D. Carlo Musso, CorrectHealth, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fehrle v. City of Savannah, Chatham County et al
as 4:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Bradley Fehrle
Defendant:
City of Savannah, Chatham County, Robie Walp, The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
