Cases 1 - 10 of 4,753
Weekly v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04752
Plaintiff:
London Weekly
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02909
Plaintiff:
Abel Garcia and Leonardo Martinez
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Christopher Papaionnou, Dante Koeppen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bernard Mims v. City of Chicago, et al
as 24-1564
Plaintiff:
BERNARD MIMS
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, KENNETH BOUDREAU, RICHARD PECK and others
Whitfield v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04667
Plaintiff:
Corris A Whitfield
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Officer John J. Salinas, Anthony Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dixon Jr. et al v. Lammert et al
as 1:2024cv02891
Plaintiff:
Temmy L. Dixon Jr., Cirsten M. Nunn and The City of Chicago
Defendant:
Timothy M. Lammert, Daniel P. Condreva and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Vecchio et al
as 1:2024cv04629
Plaintiff:
Martin Bailey
Defendant:
Joseph D Vecchio and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prince v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02894
Plaintiff:
Pebbles Prince
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Department and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rhodes v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2024cv02632
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lavelle Rhodes, Jr.
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Gadlen, Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
