Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Martin v. City of Louisville, Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Lillacalenia v. The City of Louisville Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
The City of Louisville Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Lillacalenia v. City of Louisville
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
City of Louisville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lillacalenia v. City of Louisville
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
City of Louisville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. City of Louisville
as 3:2021cv00629
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
City of Louisville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2020cv00820
Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, Gary Mason, City of Louisville and others
Plaintiff:
Keith West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2020cv00818
Defendant:
James Hellinger, Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville and others
Plaintiff:
Johnetta Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrnes v. Flaherty et al
as 3:2019cv00772
Defendant:
Richard E. Flaherty, Inspector Dana R. Crawford, Inspector Jason Heick and others
Plaintiff:
John Byrnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Dollar Tree et al
as 3:2019cv00666
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Freeman
Defendant:
Various Neighbors, City of Louisville, Dollar Tree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
