Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pinnacle Performance & Repair, Inc. et al v. City of Owasso, The
as 4:2019cv00183
Defendant:
City of Owasso, The
Plaintiff:
Michael R Mayopoulos, Pinnacle Performance & Repair, Inc. and Kristi Dyan Mayopoulos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. Chambless et al
as 4:2017cv00280
Plaintiff:
Mike Denton
Defendant:
Scott Chambless, Kevin Lanham, Chris Leamon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathews v. City of Owasso et al
as 4:2016cv00438
Plaintiff:
Cody Robert Mathews
Defendant:
City of Owasso , Michael Denton , Andrew Eubanks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Denton v. Yancey, et al
as 15-5114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKE DENTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN YANCEY, individually and in his official capacity, RODNEY RAY, individually and in his official capacity and CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA, a municipal corporation
Denton v. Yancey et al
as 4:2013cv00709
Plaintiff:
Mike Denton
Defendant:
Dan Yancey, Rodney Ray and City of Owasso, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. City of Owasso et al
as 4:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
Smokey Davidson
Defendant:
City of Owasso, Jarod Mitchell and Bobby Sordo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell et al v. Yancey et al
as 4:2012cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jarod Mitchell , Lem Mutii and Darryl Jones
Defendant:
Dan Yancey and City of Owasso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Huntley v. City of Owasso, et al
as 11-5145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. HUNTLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF OWASSO, a municipal corporation of the State of Oklahoma, JAROD MITCHELL, an individual and TIM HUTTON, an individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
