Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Do Not Pass Go LLC et al v. City of Rockford
as 1:2024cv01349
Plaintiff:
Do Not Pass Go LLC, Next Step Recovery Homes Inc., Jason Ridley and others
Defendant:
City of Rockford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Do Not Pass Go LLC et al v. City of Rockford
as 3:2024cv50074
Plaintiff:
Do Not Pass Go LLC, Next Step Recovery Homes Inc., Jason Ridley and others
Defendant:
City of Rockford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shawnqiz Lee v. Eric Harris, et al
as 24-1053
Plaintiff:
SHAWNQIZ LEE
Defendant:
ERIC HARRIS, Detective, BRANDON POFELSKI, Detective and CITY OF ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS
SPENCER v. CITY OF ROCKFORD DISTRICT ATTORNEY
as 1:2023cv03236
Plaintiff:
PRINCESS MARIA SPENCER
Defendant:
CITY OF ROCKFORD DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oxford House, Inc. v. City of Rockford, Illinois
as 3:2023cv50366
Plaintiff:
Oxford House, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Rockford, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Moton et al v. City of Rockford et al
as 3:2023cv50120
Plaintiff:
Teshayla Moton and Shenita Moton
Defendant:
City Of Rockford and J. Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thurman King v. City of Rockford, MI, et al
as 22-2038
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THURMAN KING
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF ROCKFORD, MI, ROCKFORD, MI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ZACHARY ABBATE, Officer, in his individual capacity and others
Moore et al v. Lauer et al
as 3:2022cv50354
Plaintiff:
Stephene Moore and "PM"
Defendant:
Bradley Lauer, The City Of Rockford, Scott Dimke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2412
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
