Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Uzamere v. Uzamere et al
as 1:2022cv04876
Defendant:
Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, Austin I. Idehen, Esq., Democratic National Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Iacobi v. Minch et al
as 1:2021cv04407
Plaintiff:
Alexandru Iacobi
Defendant:
Captain Charles A. Minch, P.O. Neysa Gonzales, P.O. Jean Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avent v. Estervez et al
as 1:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Briggs, John Doe, P.O. Estervez and others
Plaintiff:
Reuben Avent
Respondent:
Anthony Annucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McMurray et al v. Mohr et al
as 1:2020cv00689
Plaintiff:
Nate McMurray, Ronald Coons and Pauline Grabeki
Defendant:
Ralph M. Mohr and Jeremy Zellner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avent v. Estervez et al
as 1:2020cv01197
Defendant:
P.O. Briggs, P.O. Estervez, Unidentified P.O. John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Reuben Avent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coon v. Merola et al
as 1:2019cv00394
Plaintiff:
Donald James Coon
Defendant:
Jane/John Does and Frank Merola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avent v. Meilunas et al
as 1:2019cv00070
Defendant:
P.O. Briggs, NYS Division of Parole, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Reuben Avent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coon v. Town of White Creek et al
as 1:2016cv00318
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Coon
Defendant:
Town of White Creek, Rona Meensworth and Albert Nollette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Coon v. Bell et al
as 1:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Coon
Defendant:
George Bell, Village of Cambridge, NY, Village of Greenwich, NY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coon v. Burkly et al
as 1:2013cv01306
Plaintiff:
D. James Coon
Defendant:
Catherine A. Burkly, Town of Whitecreek, Marvin Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
