Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HARDRICK v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv02151
Plaintiff:
CORTEZ HARDRICK
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEIN v. OCASIO-CORTEZ
as 1:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER STEIN
Defendant:
ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, HON. CAROLYN MALONEY, JAMES COMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CORTEZ v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2019cv03847
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, MARYPAT WRIGHT, TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORTEZ v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv01641
Defendant:
MARYPAT WRIGHT, SARA ALMALIK, CASSIDY SOVA and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORTEZ v. SULTAN AL HITHALAYN et al
as 1:2019cv01642
Defendant:
MARYPAT WRIGHT, RICK SCOTT, SARA ALMALIK and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLUMENTHAL et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, BRIAN SCHATZ and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
HAROLD H. BRUFF, PETER SMITH, BOB CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CORTEZ v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2015cv00863
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Defendant:
MARY PAT WRIGHT, LOULOUWA ALFAISAL and LOULOUA ALSABAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PULTE HOMES, INC. et al v. GODDARD et al
as 1:2010cv00377
Plaintiff:
PULTE HOMES, INC. , PULTE HOME CORPORATION and PULTE MORTGAGE LLC
Defendant:
TERRY GODDARD and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LENNAR CORPORATION v. CORTEZ-MASTO
as 1:2010cv00378
Plaintiff:
LENNAR CORPORATION
Defendant:
CATHERINE CORTEZ-MASTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
