Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Thomsen v. Armfield et al
as 5:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
William C Thomsen
Defendant:
Cory Armfield and New Cordell City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washburn v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Garfield et al
as 5:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Dale Kim Washburn
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Garfield, Town of Waukomis, Cory Rink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roni Lynn Kitchen et al v. Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County et al
as 5:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Roni Lynn Kitchen
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Garfield County Sheriffs Office, Cory Rink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomsen v. Armfield et al
as 5:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
William C Thomsen
Defendant:
Cory Armfield, Cordell Police Dept and Cordell City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castanon et al v. Cathey et al
as 5:2018cv00537
Plaintiff:
Mike Lee Castanon and Elite Oilfield Services LLC
Defendant:
Kelly Cathey , Mike Cory , Richard Bickle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stanley v. Bovos et al
as 6:2015cv00264
Plaintiff:
Corie Stanley
Defendant:
Anton Bovos, Cherokee County, Norman Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coker v. Oklahoma City City of
as 5:2015cv00442
Plaintiff:
Corie Coker
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coker v. Oklahoma City City of
as 5:2014cv00933
Plaintiff:
Corie Coker
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. Madill, City of et al
as 6:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
Kendall Cory Jones and Marcia Ann Jones
Defendant:
Madill, City of, Madill City Council, Craig Ladd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
