Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Scarlett v. Rosen et al
as 5:2022cv05436
Plaintiff:
Sidney Theodore Scarlett
Defendant:
Jeffery Francis Rosen, Daniel T. Nishigaya, Patrick Michael Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derrick Harris v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv07999
Plaintiff:
Derrick Harris
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Officer Sharon Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07576
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Haynes v. Hanson et al
as 4:2011cv05021
Plaintiff:
Gregory M. Haynes
Defendant:
Christian Hanson, Brenda Tolbert, Doe Almarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Hanson et al
as 3:2011cv05021
Plaintiff:
Gregory M. Haynes
Defendant:
Christian Hanson, Brenda Tolbert, Doe Almarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Hanson et al
as 4:2011cv05021
Plaintiff:
Gregory M. Haynes
Defendant:
Christian Hanson, Brenda Tolbert, Doe Almarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couglin v. California Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.,
as 2:2008cv02772
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Coughlin
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Tom Maugeri
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Couglin v. California Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.,
as 2:2008at01376
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Coughlin
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Tom Maugeri
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.