Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Goossens v. State of California, Board of Behavioral Sciences et al
as 5:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Laura Goossens
Defendant:
State of California, Board of Behavioral Sciences, Pearson Education, Inc. doing business as Pearson Vue and National Board for Certified Counselors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Hudson v. School Counselor
as 3:2021cv00700
Plaintiff:
Journee Hudson
Defendant:
School Counselor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Hudson et al v. Vista United School District School Counselor
as 3:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Journee Hudson and Dawn Wentworth
Defendant:
Vista United School District School Counselor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
In re Wentworth Civil Rights Cases
as 3:2021cv00757
Defendant:
San Diego County Sheriff's Dept & Personnel, CA State Board of Education & Personnel, State Board of Education & Personnel and others
Plaintiff:
Yaw Appiah, Journee Hudson and Dawn Wentworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Wilson v. Wilson et al
as 3:2020cv01076
Defendant:
Darby Fitzgerald Hertz, Brian Earl Watson, Jami Caroline Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Trump et al
as 3:2018cv02677
Defendant:
Sheriff B. Gore, IGI Correctional Officer Salas, Head Psychiatrist S. Ba rho and others
Plaintiff:
Lance R. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Pickup, et. al. v. Brown, et. al.
as 2:2012cv02497
Plaintiff:
David H. Pickup , Christopher H. Rosick , Joseph Nicolosi and others
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown , Anna M. Caballero , Kim Madsen and others
Intervenor:
Equality California
Movant:
Donald Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James M Jerra v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01907
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons BOP, Control Officer Corn, Control Officer Corn and others
Plaintiff:
James M Jerra
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
