Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harvey v. Creedmoor Psychiatric Center
as 1:2021cv07031
Plaintiff:
Lamar Harvey
Defendant:
Creedmoor Psychiatric Center, Office of Mental Health and Darrin Gerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harvey v. Creedmoor Psychiatric Center
as 1:2021cv10633
Plaintiff:
Lamar Harvey
Defendant:
Creedmoor Psychiatric Center and Office of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beazer v. New York State Office of Mental Health et al
as 1:2015cv04587
Defendant:
Susan Adams, Ann Marie Barbarotta, Creedmoor Psychiatric Center and others
Plaintiff:
James Beazer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beazer v. New York State Office of Mental Health et al
as 1:2015cv05009
Plaintiff:
James Beazer
Defendant:
New York State Office of Mental Health, Creedmoor Psychiatric Center, Ann Marie Barbarotta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06964
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06202
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
