Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Koe et al v. Noggle et al
as 1:2023cv02904
Plaintiff:
Emma Koe, Amy Koe, Hailey Moe and others
Defendant:
Caylee Noggle, The Georgia Department of Community Healths Board of Community Health, Norman Boyd and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Nancy Doe and Linda Doe
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Pediatrics, Academic Pediatric Association, American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
MIDDLEBROOKS v. CITY OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
LILLIE M MIDDLEBROOKS
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA, ERICA L WOODFORD, TAMIKA BURNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Rau v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv05200
Defendant:
Clark Millsap, Corporal. [FNU] Crutchfield, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Cheri Rau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Bartow County, Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv01381
Plaintiff:
Donald James
Defendant:
Bartow County, Georgia , Clark Millsap , Gary Dover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS et al
as 1:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
ADEL EDWARDS , FRED BARBER , VERA CHEEKS and others
Defendant:
RED HILLS COMMUNITY PROBATION LLC , MARGARET CRUTCHFIELD , MARTIELE PICKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crutchfield et al v. City of Manchester, Georgia et al
as 3:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
Albert P. Crutchfield
Defendant:
City of Manchester, Georgia, Anthony Clifton, Danny Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
