Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Arce v. Department of Wildlife et al
as 5:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Paul Acre and Geoffrey Paul Arce
Defendant:
Department of Wildlife, Zachary Paulk, Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dollarhide v. Dickens et al
as 5:2022cv00642
Plaintiff:
Jason R Dollarhide
Defendant:
Dennis Dickens, Oklahoma Highway Patrol, Mike Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrison v. Austin et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Jona Morrison
Defendant:
Lloyd J Austin, III, Dennis Goodnight, James Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Clervrain et al v. Treat et al
as 6:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Geg Treat, Greg McCortney, James Leewright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendrix v. Banther et al
as 5:2020cv01022
Plaintiff:
Connie Hendrix
Defendant:
Dennis Banther and Andy Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Kingfisher County et al
as 5:2020cv00104
Plaintiff:
Mandy Cox and Joe Cox
Defendant:
Dennis Banther and Board of County Commissioners of Kingfisher County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyrick v. Seminole et al
as 6:2019cv00133
Defendant:
Seminole, City of and Zach Dennis
Plaintiff:
Genea Wyrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
