Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
GRUSHACK v. NJ DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00623
Defendant:
CAROLE JOHNSON, ASST. SUPERVISOR MARC SIMS, MARCUS O HICKS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GRUSHACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEFE v. NJ DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2018cv07597
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. KEEFE
Defendant:
NJ DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, STATE OF NJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOYOS, v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2017cv10542
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX , ESSEX COUNTY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS , ALFARO ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
MARLEN HOYOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEFE v. N.J. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv08584
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. KEEFE
Defendant:
N.J. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, UNION BEACH, N.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAISI v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2015cv02021
Plaintiff:
HEMMINGWAY MUKORA SAISI
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPT., HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, ANTHONY R. GUALANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GONZALEZ v. CAPE MAY COUNTY et al
as 1:2012cv00517
Plaintiff:
LUIS A. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY, CAPE MAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, COUNTY OF OCEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
