Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JOHNSON v. PLYMOUTH ROCK ASSURANCE et al
as 2:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH ROCK ASSURANCE, DIANNE M. BENAUGH, MICHAEL R. WHEELER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REIMER v. UNITED STATES SENATE et al
as 2:2021cv10997
Defendant:
BEN SASSE, SUSAN COLLINS, MIKE ROUNDS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J REIMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
LEONCINI v. FEINSTEIN
as 3:2018cv14554
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEONCINI
Defendant:
SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv13229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
COVINGTON v. STATE OF NJ et al
as 1:2015cv05287
Plaintiff:
KENNETH COVINGTON
Defendant:
STATE OF NJ, CHRISTIE, STUART RABNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv06883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
THOMAS v. UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE & DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2013cv04087
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN LAWTON
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE & DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, DIANNE DECOSIMO, M.D., JANINE GRAYSON, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CATALANO et al v. TOWNSHIP OF UPPER FREEHOLD et al
as 3:2012cv06393
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D. CATALANO, S. D. WALKER, INC. and S. D. CATALANO, INC.
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF UPPER FREEHOLD, RONALD A. GAFGEN, J. STEPHEN WALTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
