Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Silva v. Swift et al
as 3:2021cv00505
Defendant:
Andrea Finlay Swift, Judge Dianne Turner, Judge William L. Campbell, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Honeycutt v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2020cv02151
Defendant:
WellPath, LLC, Dianne McChristian, Alexis White and others
Plaintiff:
Erik R. Honeycutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2020cv02150
Defendant:
WellPath, LLC, Angel Sessum, Dianne McChristian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolston et al v. Tennessee Government, State of et al
as 3:2018cv00656
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Ashley N. Duvall, The Metropolitian Government and Nashville and Davidson County, Paul Walwyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, et al
as 2:2017cv02263
Plaintiff:
Carrolet Thomas
Defendant:
The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
