Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Scott v. Georgia Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2022cv04891
Plaintiff:
Corey Draon Scott
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Human Services, Flint Judicial Circuit Division of Child Support Services, Superior Court of Henry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eggleston Mayo v. Whitman et al
as 1:2017cv03786
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Lee Whitman, Dothan Utilities, Billy Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. West Central Georgia Workforce Development Corporation
as 3:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
DeAnna Morrow
Defendant:
West Central Georgia Workforce Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Monroe v. Evans et al
as 1:2017cv02204
Plaintiff:
Shanlanda Monroe
Defendant:
Dustin Evans , Deanna Dane-Hrenyo and Daniel Stuckey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Heard et al v. Deal et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Doug Collins, G.B.I. Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard et al v. Collins et al
as 2:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Doug Collins, Nathan Deal, Casey Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00204
Plaintiff:
Crystal Frazier
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Sandra Batten and Deanna Deskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
