Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Quartus Stitt v. City of Decatur, et al
as 24-2884
Defendant:
CITY OF DECATUR, OFFICER DOES 1-10, in their individual and official capacities as officers of the Decatur Police Department and DECATUR POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
QUARTUS STITT
Stitt v. City of Decatur et al
as 2:2022cv02138
Plaintiff:
Quartus Stitt
Defendant:
City of Decatur, Decatur Police Department and Officer Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gordon v. Decatur Police Department
as 2:2021cv02168
Defendant:
Decatur Police Department
Plaintiff:
Roann Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Decatur Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv02083
Plaintiff:
Adam Smith
Defendant:
Decatur Police Department, . Hughes, . Waggoner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barr v. Griffin et al
as 2:2018cv02030
Plaintiff:
Paul Barr
Defendant:
Thomas Griffin, Thomas Wheeler, Diane Couri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. City of Decatur et al
as 3:2017cv03268
Plaintiff:
Charles Palmer
Defendant:
City of Decatur, Tim Carlton, Roger Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Decatur Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv02273
Plaintiff:
Louis T Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Decatur Police Department and Diane L Beggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Macon County Court et al
as 2:2017cv02274
Plaintiff:
Louis T Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Macon County Court, Scott B Diamond, Elizabeth Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carney v. Decatur Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv02222
Plaintiff:
Adam G Carney
Defendant:
Decatur Police Department, City of Decatur, States Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Decatur Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv02032
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Chapman
Defendant:
Decatur Police Department, James Getz, Jr, Joe L Patten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
