Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Theno v. Jess et al
as 2:2024cv01513
Plaintiff:
Robert J Theno
Defendant:
F Dennis Alerding, Judge Joseph M Hood and Jaqueline Rubemeyer Jess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolff, Ronald et al v. Kaul, Josh et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Wolff, Jr. and Karri E. Wolff
Defendant:
Josh Kaul and Dennis Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cotter v. Freitag et al
as 2:2023cv01592
Plaintiff:
Jason Earley Cotter
Defendant:
Chief Craig Freitag, Captain Dennis Schroeder, Sgt Wendorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hying v. Hodges et al
as 2:2023cv01361
Plaintiff:
Martin Hying
Defendant:
Anna Maria Hodges, Denita R Ball, Dennis Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ulbricht, Huckleberry v. City of Mauston et al
as 3:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Huckleberry Ulbricht
Defendant:
The City of Mauston, Dennis Nielsen, Randall Reeg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De Witt v. Ness et al
as 2:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Carey Sue De Witt
Defendant:
Sara Ness, Peter Tempeus, Jennifer Dorow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers, Caleb v. Relitz, Scott et al
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Caleb Joshua Rogers
Defendant:
Scott A. Relitz, Deborah Relitz and Dennis G. Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hoke et al v. Johnson
as 2:2022cv01346
Plaintiff:
Dennis D Hoke, Jr and Denise A Howard
Defendant:
Deedra A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olson, Daniel v. Sauk County et al
as 3:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Olson
Defendant:
Sauk County, Aegis Corporation, Cross Jenks Mercer Maffei and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
