Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tri Nhu Phan v. Garden Grove City of et al
as 8:2021cv01987
Plaintiff:
Tri Nhu Phan
Defendant:
Garden Grove City of, Garden Grove Calif Police Dept, Tom Dare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Finander et al v. Riverside County California et al
as 5:2020cv00449
Defendant:
Does I-X and Riverside County California
Plaintiff:
Brian Finander and Marlene Finander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv02178
Plaintiff:
Carey L Johnson
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection, U.S Border Patrol Agent Clark, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Yassine v. Dobbins
as 3:2014cv01660
Plaintiff:
Imad Yassine
Defendant:
Antonio M. Dobbins and Does I-X, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lycurgan Inc. v. Jones
as 3:2014cv00548
Defendant:
B. Todd Jones, Earl Griffith, Unkown Named Named Agents I-VII and others
Plaintiff:
Lycurgan Inc. and Lycurgan Inc. doing business as Ares Armor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Ana Beltran et al v. Raford Management Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv06757
Plaintiff:
Ana Beltran, Antonio Beltran, Stephany Gilmore and others
Defendant:
Raford Management Co., Inc., George McHose, Culver Apts, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
