Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dupree et al v. Village of Bellwood et al
as 1:2018cv08304
Defendant:
Trevarthen, Woods-Ortiz, Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Cletter Dupree, Robin McDaniels, on behalf of herself and as Mother and Next Friend of S.B. and L.M., Tisha Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupree v. Hill et al
as 1:2018cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cedric Dupree
Defendant:
Mercedes Hill and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupree et al v. Locke et al
as 1:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Donna Dupree and SHERRY HARTISON
Defendant:
Angela Locke, Clara Sharon, Linne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virgil et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv09966
Plaintiff:
Daniel Virgil and Sade Dupree
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Ronald Schmuck and Chicago Police Officers John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupree v. Hyatt Regency Hotels et al
as 1:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Cedric Dupree
Defendant:
Hyatt Regency Hotels, Brianna Pickett and Anthony Beach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dupree v. Hardy et al
as 1:2013cv06528
Plaintiff:
Cedric Dupree
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Warden Pfister, Wayne Germaine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hicks v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00989
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hicks
Defendant:
Barry Clark, Sonia Arvanitis, Edward Boswell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupree v. Sebring et al
as 3:2011cv03436
Plaintiff:
David Louis Dupree
Defendant:
Joyce McAfee Sebring, Harold Sebring, Steven Puller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupree et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv04730
Plaintiff:
Samuel Dupree and D'andre Greer
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Supt. Currie, Supt. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
