Cases 1 - 10 of 15
GIDDENS et al v. LAWSON et al
as 7:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant:
HUGH LAWSON, W LOUIS SANDS, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FLORES v. HOLDER et al
as 4:2014cv00222
Plaintiff:
ERIC FLORES
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and SIERRA MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
DUE vs. CAMP, et al.
as 1:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, JOHN M GERRARD, F A GOSSETT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Heard et al v. Collins et al
as 2:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Doug Collins, Nathan Deal, Casey Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUE v. CAMP et al
as 1:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, JOHN M GERRARD, F D GOSSETT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv01179
Plaintiff:
Mario Trejo Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America, Jeh Johnson, Felicia Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv04144
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gail Grant, Harrison Grant and Olivia Grant
Defendant:
Eric Holder, The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv01352
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Stevens
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Juan Osuna, Frank Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youhoing et al v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00733
Plaintiff:
Shennielle Shellielle Youhoing, Mahabir Nanan, Mohaberry D. Youhoing-Nanan and others
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Department, Clayton County Sheriff Department, Kemuel Kimbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
