Cases 1 - 10 of 15
CHIN v. TOWNSHIP OF HILLSBOROUGH et al
as 3:2023cv02949
Plaintiff:
SUSAN ELIZABETH CHIN and THE ESTATE OF PATRICK CHIN
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF HILLSBOROUGH, MICHAEL MACMAHON, GEORGE KOKINAKOUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv18746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HIRSCH v. KAIREY et al
as 3:2021cv13718
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT M. HIRSCH
Defendant:
ELIZABETH M. KAIREY, MIRIAM SABZEHROO, RAQUEL SABZEHROO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WATKINS-EDMOND v. INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 3:2019cv15338
Defendant:
INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
TOPAZA WATKINS-EDMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. HADDON TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2018cv15122
Defendant:
HADDON TOWNSHIP, POLICE OFFICER ROBERT MULHERN and POLICE CHIEF MARK CAVALLO
Plaintiff:
EDMOND BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04311
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PENDLETON v. FICHTNER et al
as 2:2016cv08969
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUGHES PENDLETON
Defendant:
AARON FICHTNER, DAVID FISH, JOSEPH SEIBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SEVERINO v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY et al
as 3:2014cv06919
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. SEVERINO, III
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY, BOROUGH NORTH BRUNSWICK-MUNICIPAL COURT , SHERAL ROSSMANN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
