Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Holz v. Katterhenry
as 5:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Dan Katterhenry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Holz v. Linsay
as 5:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Terry Linsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holz v. LNU et al
as 5:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Holz v. Jasper et al
as 5:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Brooke Jasper and Shartel Towers Apartments The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wrenn v. Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Darrick Edward Wrenn
Defendant:
Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General, Scott Pruitt, Mike Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonilla et al v. Gerlach et al
as 5:2023cv01060
Defendant:
Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Board of County Commissioners of Grady County, Jim Gerlach and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gabler v. United States of America, ex rel. et al
as 6:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Gabler, II
Defendant:
United States of America, ex rel., State of Oklahoma, Woodward, City of and others
Respondent:
City of Woodward of Oklahoma and County of Woodward Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Morrison v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Gary Tyrone Morrison
Defendant:
Joel P Ward, Joel Burks, Robert Dobbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
White v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Edward D White
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Tulsa Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
