Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman v. McCoy et al
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Anthony Freeman
Defendant:
Sheriff Russell McCoy and Unknown Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman v. Clements et al
as 3:2021cv00321
Defendant:
Dupont Suites, Renita R. Clements, Cesears Indiana and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceesay v. LMPD et al
as 3:2021cv00218
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Freeman and Kimberly Freeman Ceesay
Defendant:
Various Neighbors, LMPD and Postal Clerk Manager and Carrier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. Dollar Tree et al
as 3:2019cv00666
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Freeman
Defendant:
Various Neighbors, City of Louisville, Dollar Tree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Lewis v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Troy Lewis
Defendant:
Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government , Louisville Metro Department of Corrections , Allan Fugate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman v. Little Ceasars et al
as 3:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Freeman
Defendant:
Little Ceasars, Walmart Neighborhood Markets and Steak n Shake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00782
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Freeman
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kroger Mad Lane and Kroger Stores, City of Louisville and Local Businesses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Freeman
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, City of Louisville, Kroger Stores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
