Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Riley v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
Cordero Riley
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Jeffrey Turner, Alieka Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. East Point Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01530
Plaintiff:
Justin Stewart
Defendant:
East Point Police Department, April Jackson, Franklin Hollie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade et al v. Morgan et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Betty Wade and David Jacob Henegar
Defendant:
Keambriah Morgan, Jessica Blount, Tamara Grier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
JONES v. GTR ENTERPRISES INC et al
as 7:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
DERRELL JONES
Defendant:
GTR ENTERPRISES INC, FRANKLIN R. ROLLINS, JR., CALEB LINDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
HALL et al v. FRANKLIN SPRING CREEK FORD LLC
as 1:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
CAREY HALL and JIMMY HALL JR
Defendant:
FRANKLIN SPRING CREEK FORD LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
FRANKLIN v. TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN K FRANKLIN
Defendant:
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA and SHERIFF DARREN MITCHUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FRANKLIN v. THE CITY OF WARNER ROBINS et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN K FRANKLIN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF WARNER ROBINS and SERGEANT TIMOTHY T PIPPIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
