Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Franklin v. Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development
as 2:2023cv20357
Plaintiff:
EDWINA FRANKLIN
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
MALEK v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv04344
Defendant:
SAFE HORIZON, CORPORATION COUNSEL, MATTHEW DUFFY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MALEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEEJAIZ LLC et al v. TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN et al
as 3:2023cv03192
Plaintiff:
DEEJAIZ LLC doing business as SUPREME EVENTZ AND SUPREME PRODUCTIONZ, JASON ROBINSON and DANYALE ROBINSON
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN, VINCENT LUPO, DOUG KOWALSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
FRANKLIN v. THE JERSEY CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY
as 2:2023cv02002
Plaintiff:
EDWINA FRANKLIN
Defendant:
THE JERSEY CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
PIMENTAL v. SOTO
as 2:2022cv06712
Plaintiff:
KEYRIS PIMENTAL
Defendant:
FRANKLIN G. SOTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
