Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BRAME v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
CHESTER BRAME
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DELVILA et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv02521
Plaintiff:
JUAN DELVILA , JUAN SOLER , TONY MASON and others
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CRUZ et al v. HULMES et al
as 2:2015cv02234
Plaintiff:
JOEL CRUZ , ADALERTO MORALES RODRIGUEZ and JOSHUA MORALES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY, PATRICK BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCAIN v. DMYTRYK et al
as 2:2015cv01296
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MCCAIN
Defendant:
STEPHEN DMYTRYK, MICHAEL SPICER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VALENTINE v. DMYTRYK et al
as 2:2015cv01294
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VALENTINE
Defendant:
STEPHEN DMYTRYK, MICHAEL SPICER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCAIN v. DMYTRYK et al
as 2:2015cv01295
Plaintiff:
BRAHEEM MCCAIN
Defendant:
STEPHEN DMYTRYK, MICHAEL SPICER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DELBUONO v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv05064
Plaintiff:
DEBRA DELBUONO
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY, JOHN SPEISER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MIRANDA v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv00854
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MIRANDA
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, THOMAS KUHN, MICHAEL SPEISER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv00766
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JOHNSON
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv06311
Plaintiff:
QUIANA ADAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES H. RAMSEY, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
