Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gibbons et al v. Howe
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gibbons and Soultry Sounds Enterprise Inc.
Defendant:
Sedera Fletcher Howe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wade et al v. Morgan et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Betty Wade and David Jacob Henegar
Defendant:
Keambriah Morgan, Jessica Blount, Tamara Grier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Licari v. Hughes et al
as 1:2021cv04034
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Licari
Defendant:
Rena Hughes, Mary Kay Holthus, Elizabeth Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gibbons v. McBride et al
as 1:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gibbons
Defendant:
William McBride, Ernest Black, Jr., Eugene Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tidwell et al v. Paquette et al
as 1:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Laura Elizabeth Wilson Beth Tidwell , Ryan Tidwell and Lora Lynne Logue
Defendant:
Patrick Paquette, B. Alan Logue, Jr., Bruce A. Logue, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bradley v. Sean et al
as 4:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
Theresa Bradley
Defendant:
Russell Sean, Rus Drew, George Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Galvin v. City of Canton et al
as 1:2008cv01636
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Galvin
Defendant:
City of Canton, City of Canton Police Department, Jeff Lance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galvin v. City of Canton et al
as 1:2008mi00103
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Galvin
Defendant:
City of Canton, City of Canton Police Department, Jeff Lance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
