Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05968
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Godinez v. Village of Sauk Village et al
as 1:2024cv04317
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Godinez
Defendant:
Travon Done and Village of Sauk Village
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beverly v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Derrick Beverly
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Antonio Godinez Star No. 19613, Frank Bogatitus Star No. 17956 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Scribner v. Jordan et al
as 1:2022cv05951
Plaintiff:
Jamie Scribner
Defendant:
Ralph Jordan, Etni Santana, Maria Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Silva et al
as 1:2022cv05416
Plaintiff:
Floyd R. Lewis
Defendant:
Timothy M. Silva, Ognjen K. Shaljanin, Karl D. Kruger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin et al v. Godinez et al
as 1:2022cv02886
Plaintiff:
Janalene Franklin, Marion Thomas and N. M.
Defendant:
Manuel Godinez, Gregory Zia, Michael Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dupree et al v. Locke et al
as 1:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Donna Dupree and SHERRY HARTISON
Defendant:
Angela Locke, Clara Sharon, Linne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swain v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv01183
Plaintiff:
Deanna Swain
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Charles Peck, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Godinez v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv07344
Plaintiff:
Janet Godinez
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Keith M. Lindskog, James A. McAndrew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
