Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
GOODWIN v. CITY OF PATERSON, et al.
as 2:2024cv04544
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOODWIN
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, DETECTIVE JASON ENGLISH, DETECTIVE RYAN DUFFY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RITCHWOOD v. CITY OF HOBOKEN et al
as 2:2024cv02031
Plaintiff:
JASON RITCHWOOD
Defendant:
CITY OF HOBOKEN, ROBERTO CUEVAS, WILFRED GOMEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BENJAMIN v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2023cv22570
Plaintiff:
CHRIS AVERY BENJAMIN
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE OFFICER (P.O.) M. STROTHERS, BADGE NO. 609 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOMEZ v. UNION CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2022cv03454
Plaintiff:
FREDDY RAFAEL GOMEZ, SR.
Defendant:
UNION CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, MAYOR BRIAN P. STACK, JUSTIN MERCADO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
GOMEZ-EL v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv00505
Defendant:
ETHIBERT OLEKA, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ANWAR SIRAJ GOMEZ-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10849
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv14457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
