Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Hollimon v. Citizens Review Board et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Hollimon
Defendant:
Citizens Review Board, Judge Kent J. Dawson, Judge Richard F. Boulware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tutankhaman v. Woods et al
as 2:2022cv01894
Plaintiff:
King Dr. Mygu Michael Nygu Tutankhaman Lagos Halios, Dr. Michael D Gates, III, Michael Maxwell Hill and others
Defendant:
Kimberly Woods
Tutankhaman v. Nestle
as 2:2022cv01877
Plaintiff:
King Dr. Mygu Michael Nygu Tutankhaman Lagos Halios, King Dr. Michael V. Dumpledore, III, Michael Maxwell Hill and others
Defendant:
Nestle
Gordon et al v. The City of Las Vegas et al
as 2:2022cv01446
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gordon, Lilith McGrath, Kiana Fullmore and others
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas, Fremont Street Experience, LLC and The City of Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. McPeak et al
as 2:2022cv01406
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Wright
Defendant:
Christopher McPeak, Cristina Silva, Kimberly Frayn and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00182
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00769
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00822
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00842
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
