Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gregg v. Thurman et al
as 3:2023cv01801
Plaintiff:
Adam Gregg
Defendant:
Tequila Thurman, Carrie Hutchison and John Copic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01160
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
Don Arnold, Joseph Ball, Michelle Cale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haney v. Blumenauer et al
as 3:2011cv00989
Defendant:
Gregory E Abel, Wedge Abels, Sam Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Azonia Haney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kelly v. Brown et al
as 3:2011cv00975
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kelly v. Eckert et al
as 3:2011cv00949
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DeMartino v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2010cv06176
Defendant:
Pamela Abernethy, David Brewer, Jeff Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. DeMartino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sweet et al v. Myers et al
as 3:2008cv00671
Plaintiff:
Adam Sweet and 2Brothers Moving & Delivery
Defendant:
Hardy Myers, Gail Achterman, Michael Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
