Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06556
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morris v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2023cv06511
Plaintiff:
Justin Morris
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Amber Grosch, Geoffrey Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07451
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Benitez v. Lopez et al
as 1:2017cv03827
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Benitez
Interested Party:
City of NY
Defendant:
Tina Grillo, Frank Libretto, Raul Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Van Allen v. New York City School Construction Authority et al
as 1:2017cv02176
Defendant:
Sharon Greenberger, Lorrane Grillo and New York City School Construction Authority
Plaintiff:
Roy Van Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00451
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00332
Defendant:
City of New York, Andy Espinal, Nigel Fenton and others
Plaintiff:
Shakima Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
