Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HURST et al v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE et al
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
JASON HURST, NICOLA MORELAND and BENNETT HARRELL
Defendant:
CITY OF GAINESVILLE, GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, RONALD A PINKSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HARRELL v. KIRKLAND
as 4:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
COLONEL HARRELL
Defendant:
KIRKLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHASE v. WALSH et al
as 5:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
LINDA CHASE
Defendant:
MARTIN WALSH, MERRICK GARLAND, JASON R COODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Chambliss v. Brevard County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Timothy Said Chambliss
Defendant:
Sheriff Wayne Ivey, Tyler Harrell, Brevard County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRELL v. HILLSBOROUGH SHERIFFS OFFICE
as 1:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GASTON HARRELL, III
Defendant:
HILLSBOROUGH SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
